Aldridge Rucker
Dr. Teresa Coronado
English 226
20 November 2012
“The Whistle”: Aldridge Rucker, “Franklin’s ‘Whistle’ Still
Ringing True Today”
Commonly, while
reading works from the canon of early American literature, one might feel alienated,
or unable to relate to the material at hand; the settings and interactions,
morals, daily routines, etc. all seeming foreign and even fantastical – or, at
the least, a little different from contemporary life. However, not everything
back then was entirely different; some major problems in modern America took
root in the Colonial days, and we feel the presence of these issues if not in
an even stronger sense today. “The Whistle,” by Benjamin Franklin, written in
1779 and first published in 1921 by Brad Stephens & Company, is a truly
American piece, years ahead of its time, and it deserves a place in the canon
of American literature as it is a critical text on the effects of materialism
(a truly relatable topic, given the 200 year gap) on one’s health. Franklin’s work (originally written as a
letter to a friend) points out what he believed to be important issues
concerning his fellow Americans. Although “The Whistle” is a brief piece, it
touches on a wide range of issues concerning materialism that can still be
felt, if not more predominately in modern society, an opinion boldly supported
by Steven Miles, who, in his book, Consumerism:
As a Way of Life, writes, “Everyday life in the developed world appears… to
be dominated by our relationship with consumer goods” (1). Miles’ statement
about modern society (similar to many contemporary opinions) shows how
important the topic of materialism is today. Due to the modern relevance of the
problems Franklin discusses, it is remarkable that “The Whistle” was written
over 200 years ago. With the potential
flaws in materialism that Franklin discusses, his work also shows how, in early
America, not everyone was entirely content with capitalism and more
specifically, materialism.
Benjamin Franklin
(1706-1790) is undoubtedly one of the most famous men in American history - he
even holds the popular nickname “The First American” (Brands). In 1732, he
began to issue the “Poor Richard’s Almanac” filled with “borrowed or composed…
pithy utterances of worldly wisdom which are the basis of a large part of his
popular reputation” (Franklin 3). So, Franklin gained a reputation through his
literature, another reason why all his works are important. He also wrote,
“Father Abraham’s Sermon,” which is “now regarded as the most famous piece of
literature in Colonial America” (3). He gained fame in science, philosophy,
literature, and public affairs among other realms (3). Although the highly
esteemed Benjamin Franklin wrote many famous works of literature, “The Whistle”
remains fairly unknown, despite its crucial depiction of early America and what
Franklin viewed as a major problem – materialism.
In “The Whistle,”
(1779) Franklin tells an anecdote of when he was younger in which he paid a
large sum for a whistle which brought him great joy; however, after returning
home, his parents laughed and told him he paid four times too much for the toy
whistle’s worth (“The Whistle”). This
disheartened Franklin, and the idea of “paying too much for one’s whistle”
became, to him, a metaphor for the way that some people place too much value in
what he calls “things” (“The Whistle”). Franklin’s idea of “paying too much for
one’s whistle,” is very similar to the idea of “materialism,” which can be
defined as a “interest in and desire for money, possessions, etc., rather than
spiritual or ethical values” (“The Whistle”; “Materialism”). What makes this such an important piece of
American literature, is how throughout “The Whistle,” Franklin hints at the
ways that materialism can become a competition, effecting one’s relationships
with others; how materialism can affect one’s own mental well-being; and he
also discusses specific “things” that one might be attracted to. What also makes this piece so important is
the way it touches on groundbreaking observations that call forth many
questions, altogether begging for further research.
One way in which
Franklin criticizes capitalism, is by pointing out flaws in competition – a
major driving force of capitalism. By
stating, “When I saw one ambitious
of Court favour, sacrificing his … Virtue and perhaps his Friend, to obtain it;
I have said to myself, This Man gives too much for his Whistle,” Franklin seems
to suggest that by desiring one thing so heavily, such as “court favour” (or
flattery), one often sacrifices “virtue” and friendship (“The Whistle”). The
quest for material, or impersonal things, becomes a competition, as Franklin
suggests, standing in the way of personal relationships; this competition
becomes part of the “miseries of mankind” that he later refers to (“The
Whistle”). Franklin also states that, in search of these “things” (in this
particular instance - “popularity”), one “neglect[s] his own Affairs, and
ruin[s] them by that Neglect,” which can be interpreted as stating that one
often forgets (“neglects”) family members or friends (“Affairs”) in the
competition for wealth or material possessions (“The Whistle”). Similar to the
idea of the competition of capitalism, Franklin
also seems to suggest that rather than simply being in competition for material
things (being in competition implies that one is aware of his/her competitor),
one simply forgets about all other relationships; or, in other words, one
becomes selfish, or egotistical, being only concerned with self-gain. In all these examples, Franklin suggests that
putting too much stock into material objects (materialism) can harm one’s
relationship with others. By stating in his book, Materialism: Trait Aspects of Living in the Material World, that
“materialism is an essentially egotistic trait that opposes altruism and …
sharing,” Russell W. Belk, Ph. D, seems to agree with Franklin that
materialistic tendencies can become egotistical. Modern social scientist,
Daniel Yankelovich, is quoted in Belk’s work as stating, “consumption has led
American consumers away from each other,” which is also in agreement with
Franklin that a materialistic mindset can destroy relationships (3). These
contemporary ideas, with their similar statements, show how important and
foretelling Franklin’s
views truly were. The idea of the impersonality among those who “pay too much
for their whistles,” or, materialistic types, again resonates in Belk’s
argument, when he states that “our society of shoppers has produced social
relations that are more impersonal… and certainly less community-minded than we
wish” (3). All of this seems to suggest that while consuming is an important
factor of capitalism, one must be careful not to let the luster of material
objects, and the appeal of more abstract things such as popularity stand in the
way of human relationships. However, disconnected relationships and selfishness
aren’t the only negative effects of materialism that Franklin alludes to.
When discussing
the drawbacks of “paying too much for one’s whistle,” Franklin also alludes to the psychological
effects materialism can produce.
Franklin states how, while attempting to gain material possessions, some
people “sacrific[e] every laudable Improvement of [their] Mind … ruining
[their] Health,” which shows just how detrimental Franklin believed materialism
to be to one’s mental health (“The Whistle”). This is another reason why
Franklin’s, “The Whistle” is crucial to the literary canon; Franklin’s perception
of the psychological problems of materialism are drastically ahead of his time
as, today, this problem has been given notable scientific attention. In his book, The High Price of Materialism, Tim Kasser states, “people who
strongly value the pursuit of wealth and possessions,” (or, like Franklin says,
people who “pay too much for their whistle,”) Kasser continues, “report lower
psychological well-being than those who are less concerned with such aims,” in
other words, putting high value on material objects can end up effecting one’s
own mental health (2). In Franklin’s view, putting to much value on material
items is “a great [misery] of mankind” (“The Whistle”). The grandiosity of this
statement implies that Franklin (again, arguably one of the most famous and
admired Americans in history) saw materialism as a major problem in American
society and the seriousness in which this esteemed American viewed materialism
again proves why this text is so crucial to a true depiction of American
history. Kasser’s view seems to
correlate with Franklin’s, when Kasser states, “the American dream has a dark
side, and the pursuit of wealth and possessions might actually be undermining
our well-being” (2). Notice the grand language in Kasser’s bold statement as
well – “the American dream” – as it implies that Kasser views this as a major
American problem. Also, Kassers’ statement hints at a question that lies within
Franklin’s work (does the pursuit of wealth end up hindering personal
connections?) which will be explored further, later on. Further exemplifying
how important of an issue the psychological effects of materialism have become
today – and also how important “The Whistle” is to the literary canon - Kasser
notes that multiple scientific studies now exist on the subject. Kasser states,
“Existing scientific research on the value of materialism yields clear and
consistent findings. People who are highly focused on materialistic values have
lower personal well-being and psychological health than those who believe that materialistic
pursuits are relatively unimportant” (4). This data proves that Franklin’s
assumption that materialistic pursuits are capable of “ruining [one’s] health”
is true (“The Whistle”). If the
materialistic mindset taken up by so many Americans proves to be detrimental to
not only one’s surroundings but one’s own health, then why do people still hold
these ideals; what are people attempting to attain?
Although Franklin
lists what he believes to be the reasons for materialistic pursuit; that is,
the ultimate goals that he believes people are aspiring toward in their
pursuits (“court favour,” “popularity,” “wealth,” “corporeal satisfactions,”
“appearance,” and, perhaps the most materialistic, “cloathes [sic], fine
houses,” and “fine furniture”), he never clearly indicates why, in his opinion,
one might sacrifice his/her relationships and health for these objects (“The
Whistle”). He only states that the “great Part of the Miseries of Mankind are
brought upon them by the false Estimates they have made of the Value of
Things,” in other words, the main argument Franklin is making is that one of
the largest producers of “misery” in America, is the way that people place to
much value on material things (“The Whistle”).
All in all,
Franklin’s incredible perception of his fellow men, especially impressive by
arising at such an early time in American history, begs for further exploration
into why people place such a high value on material items and the scientific
search, as provided earlier, is underway today. Benjamin Franklin’s highly
prophetic, “The Whistle,” covers many topics related to materialism that ring
true today, topics that scientists of many sorts are now beginning to study in
depth. Although “The Whistle” might be
viewed as a brief parable, it not only contains a highly important lesson,
especially to Americans, but also evidence that the “darker” side of
materialism was rearing its ugly head over 200 years ago.
Works
Cited
Belk, Russell W. "Materialism:
Trait Aspects of Living in the Material World." Journal of
_____Consumer Research. 12.3 (1985): n. page.
Print
Brands, H. W. The First
American, The Life And Times Of Benjamin Franklin. New York: Anchor, 2002. Print.
Franklin, Benjamin. The
Autobiography of Benjamin Franklin. New York, NY: P F Collier & Son Company , 1909. Print.
Franklin, Benjamin. "The
Whistle." (1967): n.pag. Early Americas Digital Archive.
______Web. 20 Nov 2012. <http://mith.umd.edu//eada/html/display.php?docs=franklin_
bagatelle1.xml&action=show>.
Kasser, T. The High Price of Materialism.
The MIT Press, 2003. Print.
“Materialism." Collins
English Dictionary - Complete & Unabridged 10th Edition.
______HarperCollins Publishers, 2009. Dictionary.com. Web. 20 Nov. 2010.
Miles, Steven. Consumerism: As a
Way of Life. 1st ed. Sage Publications Ltd, 1998.
_____Print.
Ridge,
ReplyDeleteI think that this draft, as is, embodies the relevance and historical information required to write a compelling introduction. You've really done an excellent job in introducing your text and hooking your reader. You did a nice job explaining the short text's allegories and their manifestation of materialism--a problem that is present today.
Like some of the other introductions I read, your body begins to sound like an analysis paper--I am not sure if we are supposed to explain the piece and analyze it before the audience reads it, as it is an introduction. Otherwise, my only other "correction" or piece of advice would be to watch out for long-winded sentences, such as this one found in your first paragraph: Although “The Whistle” is a brief piece, it touches on a wide range of issues concerning materialism that can still be felt, if not more predominately in modern society, an opinion boldly supported by Steven Miles, who, in his book, Consumerism: As a Way of Life, writes, “Everyday life in the developed world appears… to be dominated by our relationship with consumer goods” (1).
Upon first read, you lost me somewhere in that sentence. I would break it into two sentences.
I would argue that this piece is extremely relevant today, and I think you did an excellent job in delving into Benjamin Franklin's biographical information. For such a short piece, you were able to come up with a solid amount of introductory information, and I think a lot of that is attributed to the fact you chose such a well known author. Though he is famous, you chose an unrecognized piece, and you have convinced me that it deserves recognition. Thank you for sharing!
Best,
--Alyssa
I really enjoyed reading both "The Whistle" and your introduction. It was nice to read something by Franklin that isn't as well known. I think that you really explored the idea of materialism well in your introduction, and how it was a significant American problem of the time. Having written about "The Sot-weed Factor", it's interesting to me how Franklin's concerns about materialism sort of mirror Ebenezer Cooke's satire about the rowdy colonists; both touch on the apparent bad behaviors of these people, but in two different ways. I also agree with Alyssa that this text is very pertinent to things that go on in today's world. Living in a society that is so focused on consumerist ideals, reading "The Whistle" kind of brings you back to reality, and helps you realize that as Americans, we have struggled with this issue for a long time.
ReplyDeleteThe one tip that I would give you as far as technical advice, is that maybe you could break your introduction down into smaller sections, at least in one part. There was one really long paragraph, and reading all of it without some kind of a break was a little much.Other than that, I really liked how you used your research and broke "The Whistle" down and examined it. The text, and your introduction, really made me stop and think about the issue of materialism. Great job.
This is a very well written introduction. I am not an expert on introductions like this by any means but from what I've read this hooked me right away and I felt like I could you throughout the whole thing. That being said I do have to agree with Alyssa where I felt that this was starting to resemble a literary paper. You did a good job taking the entire essay apart but there could be somethings that are left for the reader to discover. Like Dr. Coronado said, this is just an introduction to the piece.
ReplyDeleteAlso, I enjoyed the back story and the fact that you did pick this piece. This is something that most people don't know about Benjamin Franklin and the research you did and how you incorporated it was well put it.
The only I advice I would give is to be careful with analyzing the piece to death. But overall, this was great.
This comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteRidge,
ReplyDeleteI now realize why you had so much to say about this piece during class discussion on Thursday. Well, more than usual. I will exhaust the criticism that you may have over-summarized the work; however, you make a great case as to why this piece should be included within the canon, especially since the piece still applies to American society today. To be honest, this is one of the few pieces I've read by Franklin and I really enjoyed it. thank you for clarifying some parts of the story and adding your opinion on the work in general.
Ridge,
ReplyDelete"The Whistle" is one of my favorite works that we have read in class. I agree that it is extremely relevant to today's society, and am in strong support of your claim. Your use of outside sources to support your claim that it is indeed a "piece far ahead of its time" were all well incorporated, and I like the way in which you were able to highlight the picture that Franklin paints of what America was like 200 years ago. I agree with some of the other comments that advised you to stay away from too much analysis of the text itself. I think that you can cut out some of the analysis and replace it with a focus on the bigger picture. That is-what does this letter tell us about America's history and present day America, rather than proving the negative affects of materialism. I see some of this in your final paragraph.